Questioning Canadian Multiculturalism
Debunking the Fragmentation
Critique of Multiculturalism
Essay by Lloyd L. Wong Photos by Myungsook Lee
Lloyd L. Wong is an Associate Professor at the Department of
Sociology, University of Calgary: Citizenship and Social, Cultural and civic
Domain Leader: Prairie Metropolis Centre. His research is on Racism; Ethnic
Discrimination; Immigration; Ethnic/Immigrant Entrepreneurship; Transnational
Communities; Diasporas; Citizenship.
Multiculturalism has never been accepted wholeheartedly by Canadians whether it was in the form of public philosophy, official state policy, or actual practice on the ground. For example public opinion polling in Canada has consistently found that a significant minority of Canadians disapprove of multiculturalism in Canada and in recent years this figure has been around 25% of the population. In terms of anti-multiculturalism
sentiments amongst politicians and political parties, it should be noted that at the federal level the strongest criticism of official multiculturalism, as state policy, came from the Reform Party of Canada in the 1990s before it merged with the Progressive Conservative Party in Canada to form the present day Conservative Party. In the 1991 policy manual of the Reform Party this opposition was clearly stated as follows: ¡°We would end funding of the multiculturalism program and support the abolition of the Department
of Multiculturalism¡± (as quoted in Kirkham, 1998, 257).
Since we are approaching almost a decade into the post 9/11 era public discourses and sentiments of anti-multiculturalism have become solidified in several countries in the world including Canada. This sentiment has been fuelled by the link, in public discourse, of terrorism with multiculturalism. Thus events such as the Madrid bombings in 2004, the London bombings in the summer of 2005, and the terrorist plot by the Toronto
18 in 2006, have been cited by critics of multiculturalism. Part of this public discourse involves academics. For example, sociology professor Dr. Mahfooz Kanwar from Mount Royal University in Calgary made the following two comments to the Calgary Sun newspaper in 2006 shortly after the Toronto 18 arrests: ¡°Multiculturalism has been bad for unity in Canada. It ghettoizes people, makes them believe, wrongly, that isolating themselves and not adapting to their new society is OK. It is not.¡± and ¡°Multiculturalism
creates nations within a nation and divides the loyalty of people¡± (from Corbella, 2006a, 2006b). These two front page newspaper quotes subsequently landed on the websites of several conservative anti-immigration and anti-multiculturalism organizations as credence to their cause that immigration and multiculturalism were not good for Canada.
While the anti-multiculturalism discourse in Canada has many themes two prominent ones are illustrated by the above quotes. First, as the argument goes, multiculturalism emphasizes differences and thus naturally it is divisive and undermines social cohesion and common identity in Canada. The imagined ramifications of this lead to the second theme which is that multiculturalism¡¯s emphasis on difference potentially and ultimately
leads to a clash of cultures in Canada. This theme is a microcosm of the global ¡°clash of civilizations thesis¡± (Huntington 1993, 1996) that became very popular amongst ultra-conservatives in the United States after 9/11. So a central aspect of this anti-multiculturalism discourse is based on the perception and claim that multiculturalism is not working, or perhaps has not worked, and is segregating (rather than integrating) diverse ¡®racial¡¯, ethnic, and religious groups. In other words, the perception and
claim is that multiculturalism policy, and the reality of ethnic enclaves in Canadian cities, contributes to a fragmentation of Canadian society and makes social cohesion difficult if not impossible. However, where is the evidence that this fragmentation and clash of cultures is actually happening in Canada? Aside from the rare and isolated and highly publicized incidents such as the Toronto 18, and the evidence that racism still persists and affects many racialized peoples, the evidence experientially in terms
of peoples¡¯ everyday lives suggests that diversity in Canada has not lead to divisiveness and that there is a relative calm and no clash of civilizations or cultures. Thus the ¡°fragmentation¡± and lack of social cohesion criticism is overblown. What really exists in Canada is difference at the sub-cultural and personal levels of values. Canadians have never had a set of common values and have diverged on matters such as abortion, capital punishment, gun control, the welfare state, same-sex marriage, etc. and
in a democracy this is certainly acceptable.
Home Page 1 of 2 Next
DIVERSE 5th Issue
We are pleased to announce that DIVERSE 5th issue, Summer 2011 has been released.
12 Diversity in Canadian Workplaces What are the obstacles to a better form of ¡°diversity¡± in the workplace?
- Open Door Group
- BC Workplace Diversity Inclusion Awards
6 BC¡¯s Diversity through 30 portraits
2 ThePower of Exchange A Historic Collaboration between Germany¡¯s
Premiere Art Collections and Canada¡¯s First Nations
28 Ezra Kwizera Born in Uganda to Rwandese refugee parents, Canadian Musician and genocide survivor speaks on the art of forgiveness and of adapting to Canadian culture
42 Dana Claxton
The Mustang Suite: Questioning mobility, freedom and autonomy
24 Gung Haggis Fat Choy in Vancouver, BC: The Diversity of Canada
38 Denise Brillon Breaking barriers in the fashion world
32 Pysanky¡¯s Resurgence
Joan Brander¡¯s contribution to the renaissance in traditional
Ukrainian egg art
10 Publisher¡¯s Note
27 Benefits of being a bilingual writer
31 Canadians come in all differences
NEWS & INFORMATIONS
35 News Briefs on Multiculturalism
36 Publisher¡¯s Picks
You Can Order Here.